Lauren Francis, staff writer and Carly Williams, photo editor
The Spiritual Formation Department initiated a new chapel attendance policy last fall. The policy requires that all students who do not complete the mandatory chapel amount are required to write a two-page reflection paper and pay a $20 fine for each absence. The policy does not affect seniors who have had their Spiritual Formation credits waived for the entire 2009-2010 school year.
Comparative universities have similar policies in place, specifically Biola University which requires students to write a reflection paper and pay a $1 fine per chapel missed. Point Loma Nazarene University also enforces a fine system in which students must pay either $5 or $10 per chapel depending on how many they miss during a semester. However, other institutions such as Cal Baptist University follow a policy more similar to the old Vanguard sanctions, which limited students from registering for more than 12 units if they did not meet their chapel attendance requirements.
“The old policy did not give students a way out [academically]. I wanted to create something different that did not hinder their academic success,” Campus Pastor Vince Beresford said.
If there are any fines paid, all monies would go into the Student Life general account instead of the Spiritual Formation Department account. Therefore, the new policy does not affect students’ ability to register for classes directly; however, they will not be allowed to attend any classes until they pay their Spiritual Formation Credit fines from the previous semester.
The fine, which is being called a “processing fee”, has caused most of the upset about the new policy among students.
Fines should never be a punishment for not attending chapel. Just the association of $20 fines and missed chapels is a damaging thing and students should not be in chapel because they can’t afford not to be,” junior Marie Wilson said.
Although conversations within the department about changing the chapel policy began early in the year, students were not notified of the change until three days before the end of the fall semester, leaving little opportunity to meet the requirement.
“It’s great that they have a new system in place, but they should have told people earlier in the semester instead of waiting until it was too late to fix,” freshmen Robert Honeysett said.
Frustration also arose at the lack of student involvement in the decision, and the seemingly strategic release of the new policy so late into finals week that students would have no time to organize their opinions and offer the department their thoughts.
“Well done, Spiritual Formation. You effectively prevented any chance of public protest and allowed the month-long break to quietly sedate us before spring semester. Kudos,” senior Ben Cross said.
Cross, along with other seniors who have grown accustomed to not being punished, were outraged at the changes. In response to these feelings, the department sent an email in late December informing them they did not have to attend chapel for the rest of the year, and that their attendance requirements from the fall semester had been waived as well.
The existing policy also did not require graduating seniors to earn Spiritual Formation credits during their last semesters.
The Spiritual Formation Department began the school year by releasing an entire new system of chapel credit oppurtunities, including the addition of a Tuesday night chapel. They also provided the possibility of “Soul Care Credits,” which were established at the beginning of the semester and gives students more chances to make their chapel requirements. There are now up to nine chapel opportunities to choose from on a weekly basis, and most of the time there are more in addition to those.
“With over 150 chapels offered, Soul Care Credits and the petition process, there is no excuse for students not to make their requirements,” sophomore Ellie Kaiser said.
Beresford and the rest of the Spiritual Formation Department’s greatest desire is that no student would ever have to pay a fine or write a paper. This accountability is designed solely to be a deterrent. But they do urge students to take the sanctions seriously.
“Without consequences there is no accountability. I would be a great disservice to our students if I did not do what I believed in” Beresford said.
What People Are Saying...