Chapel debate continues
Kaley Partington, assistant editor
A packed house filled Needham Chapel on Wednesday, March 3 to discuss the ongoing debate about the changes that have been made to the chapel policy on campus. The meeting lasted almost three hours as a question and answer format kept students and faculty raising concerns to the panel, comprised of Vice President for Student Affairs Dr. Ann Hamilton, Director of Community Integration Megan McDanel, and Campus Pastor Vince Beresford.
The Spiritual Formation Department and its interns put on the forum to continue the ongoing conversation about the new policies. Chelsea Richardson, a senior and intern for the department asked that the attendees would try to hear one another before making themselves heard.
“[We] want to create a place for students to understand staff and for staff to understand students,” Richardson said, referring to the goal for the evening.
After Beresford briefly spoke about the reorganization of the department as a whole and the additional chapel opportunities that have been added this year, three representatives addressed issues that they had brought up in the previous forum.
Students were then asked to form lines by microphones to ask questions and wait for responses from both the panel and other audience members. Immediately, concerns over the elimination of the chapel requirement for seniors and the recent lack of depth were popular topics voiced by students.
“[Chapel is] a place where I’m not feeling any depth, not feeling any spiritual growth whatsoever…I’ve felt farther away from the community this year than any other year,” senior Kevin Bazan said.
Bazan views chapel as his church and was saddened by the recent rule that eliminated a chapel requirement for seniors.
Although seniors are not currently required to attend chapel, questions shifted to the implementation of a possible chapel policy for seniors, including consequences if it was not met. Hamilton stated that the withholding of diplomas is not an option, since the only permissible reason is for lack of financial payment. Junior Brianna Nishie suggested that if seniors did not make a chapel requirement, they should not be granted the privilege of walking at graduation.
Students expressed concerns over the current consequence policy for all other students, which requires a two-page paper and $20 fine per chapel missed.
“If there’s no consequence, there’s no accountability,” Beresford said in response to these concerns. He also stated that the department is currently looking into possibly altering the fee to include community service as well.
Juniors Jade Fernandez and Matt Edmondson approached the microphone with a signed petition with 10 reasons why the fine should be reversed. As a way to visually represent their support, Fernandez and Edmondson approached the stage with a shopping bag filled with almost 500 index cards with ID numbers on each one, that were dumped onto the stairs in front of the panel to illustrate all the supporters of their petition.
Other students presented opposing opinions about the $20 fee.
“Maybe we shouldn’t complain so much about the $20 fine because people would kill to pay $20 to worship God around the world,” sophomore David Vasquez said, reading a text message he had received from a peer.
By the beginning of the third hour, the audience had dwindled down to only a handful as there were still students waiting to ask questions.
Senior Ben Cross and junior Anika Wiebe both spoke regarding the financial effects on chapel. Cross compared this year’s chapels to past year’s in which more prominent speakers were brought in. He also questioned how money plays a role in the overall production of chapel.
Wiebe believes that the distribution of the school’s budget should make spirituality on campus a priority because it is the most important aspect of her schooling.
“I believe we don’t need to pay the Holy Spirit to do work on this campus,” McDanel said, countering the idea that only money will allow God to work.
The forum ended with a closing prayer with everyone holding hands. The audience and panel were thanked for their attendance and the panel expressed that the topics and comments brought up will be taken into consideration.
“I think anytime we have people listening to each other is a very positive thing because you can make changes based on listening and hearing. So I think this is a great opportunity for everyone to listen and hear,” Hamilton said at the conclusion of the forum.
According to Beresford, new decisions concerning the chapel policy will be made and communicated to students by the end of the semester.

What People Are Saying...